CALL OF DOOOTYYYY VERSUS BATTEL FEEEEELDDDDDD. Ya. The big topic. CoD vs Battlefield. Here is why I vote for CoD: More derping around, takes MUCH more skill because in BF you get tanks and planes which take no skill ; all you do is shoot dat running guy / vehicle. The map is a freaking entire COUNTRY. In CoD, it has maps that are good. In BF, you just die instantly from crap all over the place. Buildings fall and ya. BF is filled with tryhards who are sweating on their forehead trying to kill you 5million times. In CoD, it's really fun. It's derpity derpity derpity derp. You can just enjoy derping around without dying from a heli out of nowhere and being shot with a tank. BF requires less skill because all you do is climb into a vehicle and drive / fly around shooting random crap at other people. CoD requires finding the person rather than foolishly shooting random crap. In BF, you have to sign into freaking EA which idk why they do that. In CoD, you don't need any Treyarch or Activision account to play on. BattleField barely focuses on the campaign in CoD, they focus their butts and just make the missions with a storyline that makes sense. So, what I say is, BattleField Sucks. Which game do you like the best??
To be honest, I've never played any version of either... although I have played Minecraft OITC, which was apparently based off something to do with CoD. *Votes CoD because IDK*
Yes, OITC came from CoD. The MC version is the same exact version except that melees are 1hit kills. There is no armor, you only have like 1% out of 1337% hp :L
Isn't there a thread about this already on the forums? Are you trying to prove something here? I don't get it. By the way, may I ask you something: Did you played both of the games?
