Other Games CoD: Ghosts vs Battlefield 4

So if you guys are familiar with FPS (First Person Shooter) games you have got to know Battlefield and CoD. Basically...which one do you think it is the best? :D Comment below and give your opinions.

 

None of them.
Halo for the win!

 

agreed with rockor.

anit nobody got time for "realistic" war games.

 

CALL OF DOOTY GHOSTS FTW :D SCREW BATTLEFIELD

BF: big maps. only 16 v 16 ._____. Hard to find / kill people

CoD: Medium Sized Maps 8 v 8 or less, and Free For All. Easy to find people :)

 

My friend made a joke about this earlier. Here it is:

CoD= Weenie Hut Jr's
Battlefield= The Salty Spittoon

 

Err, What's Weenie Hut? and Salty Spittoon?

Is it like from a popular thing?

I was an awkward kid, to quote JcBeemer.

 

It's a Spongebob reference ._.

 

I used to love the CoD series, but after MW2 they are just "milking" more money from us, the new games are awful compared to their previous work.

Now about BF, the first time i played it (when cod mw2 was out) i thought meeeh, CoD is better, but after CoD: Black Ops (which was horrible) i tried to play bf2, it wasn't as great as the old cod games, but still better than the new ones, mw3 was the worst CoD of all and BO2 was almost good.

Anyway, i will choose BF4 instead of CoD ghosts because they graphics are better, the modes are better and the community is better.

:)

 

What's wrong with the CoD games I played: Whaat no health bar
BF is nice... so both. CoD was part of my childhood, so is BF
The realistic war games are the more awesome ones. The more authentic, the better. SNIPER ELITE FTW

 

You don't need a health bar xD
You know when you are full life or when u are 1 hit kill xD

 

Yeah, the screen isn't red hehe, but I favor the games with a very limited health...
MEH, CoD is/was great.

EDIT: he said was. v

 

was*

 

Personally, I like Battlefield 4 more that CoD. But both games (CoD: Ghosts and BF4) aren't that impressive. Talking about Battlefield, It changed quite a bit, but not as much as people were expecting. If you played the previous version of it, you might know what I'm talking about. I tried out the open beta and I was quite disappointed actually. It just feels like the same game, but without that blue and orange filter. But it's good and amazing (for new players). I just couldn't imagine myself buying it at the moment but maybe in the future. In the mean time, I'll just stick with the older version.

Same here for Call of Duty: Ghosts. It seems fun and everything, but clearly was rushed to the markets. From what I heard, it has a new engine and better graphics. Oh and dogs. But looking at the graphics, it's ALMOST the same as the previous game (or maybe I'm missing something). I would love to add something more, but I didn't try it yet.

All in all, both games are great, but not as much as some people were expecting.

P.S. I'm not a hater of any of those games. I'm just sharing my opinion.

 

None of them you need to add halo.

 

They're focused on the hand and gun textures. Considering you see it 24/7 everytime you play CoD.

 

Lol I actually hate the health bar, especially when I kill tons of people and i'm about to capture a point with only 20% health.

 

So you want a health bar or not? xD

 

BF4 was more focused on the multiplayer side than campaign. Singleplayer was only like 2 1/2 hours play time. Not sure about Ghosts but so far, BF4 has the edge over Ghosts for multiplayer

 

I like ghosts. Ghost FTW.